Several different views have emerged in explaining what has shaped governmental accounting. One, and the most common one, is that the environment of government is considerably different from business and thus government needs different accounting rules, that is, different principles and standards. In this view, government is highly legalistic and needs an accounting system to track legal requirements. Preservation of democracy and lack of market forces create the need for this legally oriented model. In a sense this is a non-political view. Governmental accounting is the way it is because of the environment in which it resides and not because of political forces.
Another view is less benign. According to it, government is a monopoly and makes rules to protect itself. As a monopoly, it over charges and under produces. Accounting and financial reporting rules are designed to reduce disclosure of this inefficiency. According to this view, the business accounting model is the one that government should use. This model, supposedly, forces a fuller disclosure. However, even the business model is only marginally effective in the eyes of some critiques of government. The best solution to governments' ineffectiveness, in the eyes of these critics, is to reduce the size of government. This view comes from the public choice literature.
As intimated, the business model for accounting and report defines financial success and conditions differently than the compliance and liquidity model. Success depends on matching all costs against all revenue for the period, regardless of when the cash exchange takes place. If a business promises large pension benefits the business must calculate the cost of those benefit for the current period even though the actual benefits will not be paid until future dates. Financial conditions in the business accounting model include both current and long term debt. For a business to have good financial conditions or health it must be able to cover both money due this year as well as have assets that will be able to cover future obligations. Governmental accounting is concerned mainly with current debt. Future obligations can be covered by the full faith and credit of the jurisdiction. .